Monday, June 28, 2010

The Cornerstone Wealth Report 6/28/10

Can world governments "cut" their way to prosperity?

It's no secret that many countries are incurring large--and unsustainable--budget deficits. What's interesting is the approach each country is taking to try to lower their deficits to a manageable level. Britain, Japan, Germany, and Greece, for example, are focused on cutting government spending, according to Bloomberg, June 22. Conversely, the U.S., while concerned about government spending, seems more focused on keeping the stimulus spending alive and raising taxes until (hopefully) the economy can catch fire and grow on its own.

Who's right?

According to Harvard University professor Alberto Alesina, “There have been mountains of evidence in which cutting government spending has been associated with increases in growth, but people still don’t quite get it.” In addition, a study by Ben Broadbent and Kevin Daly of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. as reported by Bloomberg on June 22, "discovered that reducing expenditures by 1 percentage point a year boosted average annual growth by 0.6 percentage point. Raising the ratio of taxes to GDP by the same margin cut growth by an average 0.9 percentage point." And, from a stock market perspective, the same report said, "The equity markets of the countries that sliced spending beat those of other advanced nations by 64% during a three-year period."

Like many things related to finance and economics, we won't know "who's right" until time passes and the market delivers its verdict. Between now and then, expect the vigorous debate on spending cuts versus stimulus spending to continue among academics, investors, and world leaders.


ARE THE FINANCIAL MARKETS "NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED" and should you even care? Consider this. The average height of an American male is 69.4 inches, according to the National Center for Health Statistics, October 22, 2008. If we randomly chose 1,000 American males and calculated their average height, we would likely come up with a number close to 69.4 inches. Now, in an un-random fashion, let's assume we found an 8-foot tall man--who is clearly an extreme outlier--and we have him join the previous group of 1,000. By recalculating the data, we now find the average height of this group of 1,001 men jumps by a very underwhelming 0.03 inches. In other words, adding an extremely tall outlier to this group of average height men had very little effect on the overall average height of the group. Without getting too technical and assuming "tall outliers" are just as likely to be found as "short outliers," we can say the height of men follows a "bell curve" or a normal distribution.

By contrast, let's consider the average net worth of American households. According to the Federal Reserve, February 2009, the average American family had a net worth of $556,300 in 2007. Like above, if we randomly chose 1,000 families, this group would probably have an average net worth near $556,300. However, for fun, let's add Warren Buffett--and his $40 billion net worth--to the group. Recalculating the data, we find the average net worth of this group of 1,001 Americans jumps to $40.5 million! Clearly, adding an extreme outlier to this sample dramatically changed the average of the sample.

As it relates to the financial markets, do you think their distribution of returns looks more like the average height of American men (where an extreme outlier doesn't really affect the average) or the average net worth of American households (where an extreme outlier could have an extreme impact)? If you think the returns in financial markets look like the average height of American men, but it turns out they behave more like the average net worth of American households, you could lose a lot of money. In fact, much of modern portfolio theory is based on the assumption that financial markets follow a normal distribution, i.e., they look like the average height of American men. Unfortunately, experience suggests otherwise.

Warren Buffett-type outliers such as the October 1987 stock market crash, the 2000-2002 bursting of the internet bubble, the 2007-2009 bear market, the 2008 credit crisis, and last month's "flash crash," suggest that the financial markets are subject to large outliers that can significantly affect your financial well-being. Knowing that, we do our best to try to limit the damage to your portfolio if one of these outliers occurs during your investing lifetime.

Weekly Focus – Think About It

"In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield."
--Warren Buffett
Best regards,

Your Team at Cornerstone Wealth Management

Monday, June 21, 2010

The Cornerstone Wealth Report 6/21/10

A hypothetical Doctor of Investments might say we are in an "EKG market."

We've experienced a series of headlines that have sent the market on a yo-yo ride since we dropped the New Year's ball in Times Square six months ago. Here are a few of the eye-raising events that have kept investors on an emotional rollercoaster:

 The S&P 500 index rose 15.2% between February 8 and April 23, according to data from Yahoo! Finance. Unfortunately, investor sentiment quickly turned and the index declined 13.7% between April 23 and June 7, according to data from Yahoo! Finance.
 On May 6, the "flash crash" sent the Dow Jones Industrial Average to an intra-day loss of nearly 1,000 points before making a massive recovery to end the day down "only" 348 points, according to Portfolio.com. At one point during the day, the Dow dropped 481 points in 6 minutes and then jumped 502 points just 10 minutes later.
 An April 20 explosion on a drilling rig sent as much as 60,000 barrels of oil a day flowing into the Gulf of Mexico making it the worst oil spill in American history, according to The New York Times on June 18.
 A sovereign debt crisis in Europe sent shivers through world markets and led the European Union to unveil a nearly $1 trillion loan package designed to backstop weak countries from defaulting, according to The Wall Street Journal on May 10.
 Gold prices hit an all-time high of $1,258 per ounce on June 18, "fueled by sovereign risk in the euro zone, historically low interest rates, and concern over the stability of paper currencies," according to CNBC on June 18.

Pop quiz time. After all these headline-grabbing events, in percentage terms, how much do you think the S&P 500 index has gone up or down since the end of last year? Brace yourself. The index has risen a whopping 0.2% between December 31, 2009 and last Friday.

The up-down EKG between the bulls and the bears has, like the U.S. versus Slovenia in the World Cup, ended in a draw. However, unlike the U.S. versus Slovenia, we still have six months left in this year to see who wins the yearly "Investment Cup."


HELEN REDDY PROCLAIMED, "I am woman, hear me roar. In numbers too big to ignore," back in the early 1970s. Today, those words are coming true in education, the workplace, and on Wall Street.

In an article titled, "The End of Men" in the July/August 2010 issue of Atlantic Magazine, author Hanna Rosin reported some little known statistics about how far women have come in today's society. How many of these were you aware of?

 As of earlier this year, women now outnumber men in the U.S. workforce for the first time ever.
 Even though women outnumber men in the workforce, three-quarters of the jobs lost in this recession were lost by men.
 Thirteen of the 15 job categories projected to grow the fastest over the next decade are staffed primarily by women.
 Women now hold more than 50% of managerial and professional jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
 According to Rosin, women now earn 60% of master’s degrees, about 60% of all bachelor's degrees, about half of all law and medical degrees, and 42% of all MBAs.
 A 2008 study by researchers at Columbia Business School and the University of Maryland looked at the top 1,500 U.S. companies from 1992 to 2006 and discovered that firms that had women in top positions performed better.

The rising level of women's educational attainment and workplace prominence will have a profound impact on the business and investment spheres in the years to come. As part of our "find a trend and throw yourself in front of it" philosophy, we will continue to monitor this long-term trend and the ensuing investment implications.

Weekly Focus – Think About It

“I shut my eyes in order to see.”
--Paul Gauguin

Best regards,

Your Team at Cornerstone Wealth Management

P.S. Please feel free to forward this commentary to family, friends, or colleagues. If you would like us to add them to the list, please reply to this e-mail with their e-mail address and we will ask for their permission to be added.



Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.

* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

* The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S. securities designed to reflect the performance of the global equity securities that have readily available prices.

* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

* Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.

* The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.

* The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.

* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

* Past performance does not guarantee future results.

* You cannot invest directly in an index.

* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

* To unsubscribe from the “The Cornerstone Wealth Management Report: please reply to this e-mail with “Unsubscribe” in the subject line, or write us at Tait@mycornerstonewealth.com.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

The Cornerstone Wealth Report 6/14/10

Which country is the most attractive market for investors?

Perhaps Brazil? Russia? India? China? Collectively, those four are known as the "BRIC" countries and for a number of years, many investors have pointed to them as economic stars. However, in a global quarterly poll of investors and analysts who are Bloomberg subscribers released on June 8, "Almost four of 10 respondents picked the U.S. as the market presenting the best opportunities in the year ahead." That placed the U.S. #1 on the list followed by Brazil, China, and India.

Of course, this is simply the opinion of a group of investors and analysts and it does not mean that the U.S. will turn out to be the best market. But, it does raise an interesting observation, which is… there are countries with good economics and countries with good investment opportunities--and they are not always the same.

Here's what we mean. In the first quarter of 2010, Brazil, India, and China's economies expanded at an annual rate of 9.0%, 8.6%, and 11.9%, respectively, as measured by gross domestic product, according to Bloomberg. That's huge. By contrast, the U.S. economy expanded at a relatively modest 3.0% in the first quarter, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. On the surface, you might think that the three countries with the highest economic growth rates would also present the most attractive investment opportunities. Possibly yes, but the latest survey from Bloomberg put the good ol' USA in the #1 spot.

Why would these investors and analysts put a slower-growing U.S. ahead of fast-growing Brazil, India, and China? There could be numerous reasons, but a simple takeaway is this--in the short-term, good economics does not always translate into good investment opportunities. For example, if the fast economic growth in Brazil, India, and China was already "priced into" their financial markets, then the near-term outlook for stock prices might be muted. Conversely, if the modest growth in the U.S. helped drive our stock prices down to a relatively low level, then we might be in the best position to experience a bounce from this "oversold" condition.

This is a long-winded way of saying short-term market movements might not reflect current economic realities.


DID YOU FEEL WEALTHIER in the first 3 months of this year? Well, believe it or not, the net worth of U.S. households rose by $1.1 trillion in the first quarter, according to the Federal Reserve. Most of this increase came from rising stock prices. And, if you believe economists, each extra dollar of wealth should generate about 5 cents of spending over time, according to MarketWatch. Dubbed "The Wealth Effect," it suggests that rising stock prices could lead to a virtuous cycle of higher spending, higher corporate earnings, and higher stock prices. That's the good news.

Here's the bad news. The theory also works in reverse.

Yes, household net worth was up in the first quarter, but it is still down about $11.4 trillion from its early 2007 peak, according to MarketWatch. And, with the roughly 7% slide we've seen in S&P 500 so far in the second quarter, we may see the net worth number drop when the second quarter data is released in a few months.

This net worth data and the stretched balance sheets of many Americans leaves us with a conundrum. On one hand, consumer spending accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, according to Associated Press. So, if we want robust economic growth, we need consumers to open their wallets and start buying stuff. On the other hand, the pragmatic observer says consumers are already too much in debt and need to curb their spending and build up their savings. This could lead to slower growth.

Essentially, we can keep spending by going deeper in debt and hope we can "leverage" our way to prosperity. Or, we can cut our spending, increase our savings, and gradually build our way back to a sustainable growth rate. Both scenarios would likely cause some pain. The former scenario would likely delay the pain. The latter scenario would likely speed it up.

Sooner or later, don't be surprised if we enter an "Age of Austerity" that enables (forces?) consumers to reduce their debts, and, after a painful adjustment, puts our country back on a path to prosperity.

Weekly Focus – Think About It

"I have learned, as a rule of thumb, never to ask whether you can do something. Say, instead, that you are doing it. Then fasten your seat belt. The most remarkable things follow."
--Julia Cameron

Best regards,

Tait

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.

* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

* The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S. securities designed to reflect the performance of the global equity securities that have readily available prices.

* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

* Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.

* The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.

* The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.

* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

* Past performance does not guarantee future results.

* You cannot invest directly in an index.

* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Weekly Commentary June 7, 2010

Despite the blaring headlines of late, the U.S. stock market has been stuck in a broad trading range since last September.

It's easy to get caught up in the daily gyrations of the stock market's ups and downs, but when viewed through a longer-term lens, the S&P 500 index has been pinballing between a range of about 1,040 and 1,217. The low end of the range was established in mid-September of last year and the high end of the range was reached in late April of this year, according to data from Yahoo! Finance. Last Friday, the index closed at 1,065, which is near the low end of the range.

Range-bound markets are not unusual and with the big rise we've had since March 2009, some consolidation of those gains is par for the course. Going forward, the market can do one of three things. It can continue to bounce around the range, it can breakout of the range to the upside, or it can breakdown. Of course, nobody knows until after the fact which scenario will occur, but regardless of the next direction, we continue to do all we can to help you reach your goals and objectives.

Data as of 6/4/10 1-Week Y-T-D 1-Year 3-Year 5-Year 10-Year
Standard & Poor's 500 (Domestic Stocks) -2.3% -4.5% 13.3% -11.6% -2.3% -3.2%
DJ Global ex US (Foreign Stocks) -1.2 -11.2 6.7 -12.9 1.4 -0.1
10-year Treasury Note (Yield Only) 3.2 N/A 3.7 4.9 4.0 6.1
Gold (per ounce) -0.3 9.0 24.0 21.5 23.1 15.6
DJ-UBS Commodity Index -2.7 -12.3 -4.7 -11.4 -4.7 1.6
DJ Equity All REIT TR Index -6.0 4.3 38.7 -12.1 0.8 10.3
Notes: S&P 500, DJ Global ex US, Gold, DJ-UBS Commodity Index returns exclude reinvested dividends (gold does not pay a dividend) and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; the DJ Equity All REIT TR Index does include reinvested dividends and the three-, five-, and 10-year returns are annualized; and the 10-year Treasury Note is simply the yield at the close of the day on each of the historical time periods.
Sources: Yahoo! Finance, Barron’s, djindexes.com, London Bullion Market Association.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. N/A means not applicable or not available.

HOW OFTEN SHOULD WE EXPECT THE STOCK MARKET to experience declines of at least 5%? When training for athletic events coaches are fond of saying, "No pain, no gain." Likewise, investors should expect to endure the "pain" of market declines in order to benefit from the "gain" of bull markets. But, in order to withstand these market declines, it's helpful to know how much pain is "normal."

The chart below shows more than 100 years of the frequency of various declines in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Although past performance is no guarantee of future results, the chart should give you some historical perspective:


A History of Declines (1900 - December 2009)

Type of Decline Average Frequency(1) Average Length(2)
- 5% or more About 3 times a year 48 days
- 10% or more About once a year 115 days
- 15% or more About once every 2 years 217 days
- 20% or more About once every 3 1/2 years 338 days
Source: Capital Research and Management Company
(1) Assumes 50% recovery rate
(2) Measures market high to market low

As of last week, the Dow was in the "-10% or more" category, according to CNNMoney.com. This was the first decline of 10% or more since March 2009, according to Barron's. Looking at the chart above, the current decline puts us right in line with the historical frequency of such declines.

We realize that market declines are not enjoyable even if they are in line with historical frequency. However, knowing where we stand within the context of history can help us make clearer and less emotional decisions as it relates to investment strategy.

Weekly Focus – Think About It

"The trend is your friend except at the end where it bends."
--Ed Seykota

Best regards,

Tait Lane

P.S. Please feel free to forward this commentary to family, friends, or colleagues. If you would like us to add them to the list, please reply to this e-mail with their e-mail address and we will ask for their permission to be added.

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.

* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

* The DJ Global ex US is an unmanaged group of non-U.S. securities designed to reflect the performance of the global equity securities that have readily available prices.

* The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

* Gold represents the London afternoon gold price fix as reported by the London Bullion Market Association.

* The DJ Commodity Index is designed to be a highly liquid and diversified benchmark for the commodity futures market. The Index is composed of futures contracts on 19 physical commodities and was launched on July 14, 1998.

* The DJ Equity All REIT TR Index measures the total return performance of the equity subcategory of the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) industry as calculated by Dow Jones.

* Yahoo! Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

* Past performance does not guarantee future results.

* You cannot invest directly in an index.

* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.