Monday, November 26, 2012

Weekly Commentary November 26th, 2012

The Markets

What fiscal cliff? 

Stock prices rose last week to their best weekly gain in five months as investors cheered the start of the holiday shopping season, encouraging economic data from Germany and China, improved housing data, and confidence from President Obama and Congressional leaders that the fiscal cliff will be avoided.

Is this the beginning of a “Santa Claus rally?”

Jordan Kotick, global head of technical strategy at Barclays, told CNBC, “We are about to head into the best seasonal time for the equity market.” Despite this seasonal tailwind, the market’s near-term direction may still depend on how Washington handles the pending budget and tax cliff. So far, the market seems to be pricing in a compromise that will avoid the worst-case scenario.

Beyond the fiscal cliff and a potential Santa Claus rally, what’s in store for the U.S. economy? Well, here’s a not-so optimistic take from famed money manager Jeremy Grantham:

The U.S. GDP growth rate that we have become accustomed to for over a hundred years – in excess of 3% a year – is not just hiding behind temporary setbacks. It is gone forever. Yet, most business people (and the Fed) assume that economic growth will recover to its old rates.

In his view, our economy will grow at a snail’s pace of about 1 percent per year after inflation for the next several decades. Without getting bogged down in details, his gloomy case rests on population and productivity changes.

However, there are some potential bright spots on the horizon. Please read the second half of this commentary to learn about one important part of our economy that could turn Grantham’s pessimistic view upside down.


THE YEARS 2020, 2030, AND 2035 could turn out to be pivotal years for the United States and the geopolitics of global energy. Here’s why. The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts the following will happen by those years:

·         2020 – The U.S. will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest producer of crude oil.

·         2030 – The U.S. will become a net exporter of crude oil.

·         2035 – The U.S. will become effectively self-sufficient in meeting its total energy needs through domestic sources.

Source: International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook 2012

Today, the U.S. imports about 20 percent of its total energy needs. Can you imagine a world in which the U.S. is energy self-sufficient and not beholden to foreign energy sources? This could deliver a huge boost to our economy.

Five years ago, the IEA predicted the U.S. would pump 10.1 million barrels of oil per day by 2020. In this year’s report, the IEA’s new estimate is 11.1 million barrels per day by 2020. This projected increase in production is, “driven by the faster-than-expected development of hydrocarbon resources locked in shale and other tight rock that have just started to be unlocked by a new combination of technologies called hydraulic fracturing,” according to MarketWatch.

So, we have Jeremy Grantham stating the bear case for the U.S. economy then we have the IEA publishing a report that puts the U.S. in the driver’s seat for the world energy market in the next couple decades.

Now, here’s the thing. Both Grantham and the IEA are making long-range forecasts based on data available today. Yet, we know things can change just as the IEA raised its oil production estimate from 10.1 million barrels of oil per day to 11.1 million.

Trends take time to develop and then, all of a sudden, they could change due to some new technology – as in the case of  “fracking.” We do keep an eye on these long-term trends, but we also understand that investment decisions to buy and sell have to be made based on what’s happening now. This “bi-focal” approach is one of the many tools we use to manage your assets.
 

Weekly Focus – Really?

“Whoever said money can't buy happiness simply didn't know where to go shopping.”

--Bo Derek, American actress

Monday, November 19, 2012

Weekly Commentary November 19th, 2012

The Markets

The announcement last week that Hostess Brands, the maker of iconic treats such as Twinkies and Ding Dongs, was going out of business highlights the need for investors to have a solid risk management strategy.

As you contemplate making an investment, here are three things important to know:

1.      The rationale for the investment and the research behind it.

2.      What constitutes “fair value” for the investment.

3.      What would trigger you to sell the investment.

Number three above is where many folks trip up – they don’t have a sell discipline. Although Hostess Brands long ago ceased being a publically traded company, it’s an example of how a company with well-known brands can run into trouble and fail. To avoid riding an investment all the way down to zero, it’s critical to have a system in place to monitor your investments and hit the sell button if there’s a material change that makes the original investment thesis no longer valid.

Sometimes a risk management strategy causes you to sell an investment only to see it turn around and go right back up. While frustrating, that’s better than not having any sell discipline in place and holding on to an investment that drops dramatically and never comes back.

Viewed another way, it’s better to take a small occasional loss than to hang on to everything forever and be exposed to a potential big loss down the road on your irreplaceable capital.

Risk management is back in the forefront as U.S. stocks continued their post-election slide last week. And, while we would all prefer to see the market go up, we remain focused on our risk management discipline as a key component of our overall portfolio management process.

 
ARE LOW INTEREST RATES GOOD OR BAD for the stock market? As you are painfully aware, interest rates in general are very low. There are three main reasons for this:

1.      Consumer demand for interest-bearing products is relatively high.

2.      Business demand for loans is relatively low.

3.      Central banks in many developed nations are engaged in an “easy money” policy.

Source: The Economist

All three of the above are associated with the fact that our economy is relatively weak. In difficult economic times like today, central banks have a vested interest in keeping rates low. The thinking is low rates will reduce the “hurdle rate” for businesses to reinvest and, as a result, encourage them to expand and hire new people. As businesses expand, the economy will grow and begin a new virtuous circle.

So, let’s see if this virtuous circle of low interest rates applies to the stock market, too.

Using data from the Barclay’s Capital Equity-Gilt study, The Economist took a look at U.S. stock market returns between 1926 and 2011 and sliced the data into periods when the real rate on Treasury bills (the rate after subtracting inflation) was positive and negative. What they discovered was startling:

“In the 33 years where real yields have been negative, the average gain from equities has been 2.3%; in the years when real yields were positive, the average gain was 6.2%.”

 In other words, low real interest rates (which we have today) have typically been associated with low stock market returns.

As we all know, data can often be presented in ways that support whatever position you’re taking (just like in the past election cycle!). So, putting that aside, the key is to interpret the data. Since we’ve been in a low rate environment for a long time, stock prices have likely had time to adjust accordingly. The key now is to watch for the turning point – the time when rates start a new rising trend.

When rates start to rise, that could signal the economy is on the mend as businesses start demanding more money for loans to expand and central banks pull back on the easy money policy to avoid too much inflation. This would be a “good” reason for rates to rise. Alternatively, rising rates could signal investors are losing faith in our country’s ability to pay its bills. This would be a “bad” reason for rates to rise.

We’re watching interest rates closely for any sign of a new trend and, importantly, the reason behind that trend. It’s just one of many indicators we monitor as we keep a close eye on your investments.

 
Weekly Focus – Ode to an Icon…

 “I love Twinkies, and the reason I am saying that is because we are all supposed to think of reasons to live.”
--Stephen Chbosky, novelist, screenwriter, director, and author of The Perks of Being a Wallflower

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Weekly Commentary November 14th, 2012

The Markets

Special Post-Election Analysis

With the election behind us, what’s next for the economy and the financial markets? In this special analysis, we’ll take a look at what the election means, how the markets are reacting, and where we go from here.

What the Election Means

For starters, the political makeup of the country hasn’t changed much. President Obama remains in the White House, the Democrats are still in charge of the Senate, and the Republicans retain the House. With no significant change in the balance of power, both parties will have to find ways to compromise in order to keep the country moving forward and to avoid the economy falling off the looming fiscal cliff.

Economically, our politicians need to tackle two major issues – the fiscal cliff and unemployment.

The fiscal cliff is perhaps the biggest and most immediate of the two. As a result of previous legislation, deep, automatic federal spending cuts and tax increases will take place in January unless the President and Congress agree to some alternative plan. If they fail to reach an agreement, going over the cliff, “would not only risk another recession, but would intensify anxiety about the dysfunction of the U.S. political system,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

On a related note, our ever-growing national debt is deeply entwined with the fiscal cliff issue. If Washington can effectively solve the cliff issue, it might also put the deficit on a path to sustainability – and that could be great news for the economy and the markets.

The second issue is unemployment and it is deeply entwined with economic growth. While the unemployment rate has come down, it’s still too high as, “roughly 3.6 million Americans have been without work for a year or more and are still looking,” according to The Wall Street Journal. Government policies and regulations have a major impact on corporate America’s desire to hire and expand. If our leaders can enact pro-economic growth policies, it might encourage businesses to reinvest and hire more people.

Here are several other things to keep in mind as a result of the election:

·         Health care overhaul. Love it or loathe it, it’s here to stay. Among other things, companies with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees will be required starting in 2014 to provide health-insurance benefits or pay a penalty. While small businesses may not be happy about that, at least they can now plan for it.

·         Tax increases. President Obama has said he’d like to see taxes rise for couples earning more than $250,000 a year. Also, tax rates on dividends and capital gains may rise. Of course, these won’t happen unless Congress passes them.

·         Tax breaks. Both sides seem to agree that certain tax breaks and loopholes will have to go as part of any compromise. And, while this might avoid raising tax rates, it would mean a tax increase for those affected.

·         Entitlement reform. Any “grand bargain” on the deficit will likely mean changes to Social Security and Medicare. In other words, we could see Democrats agreeing to reductions in benefits in exchange for Republicans agreeing to tax increases or closing tax loopholes.

·         Easy money. With the President’s reelection, Federal Reserve policy is likely to remain “easy.” This could mean more rounds of quantitative easing and continued low interest rates.

The economic issues facing our country are serious and the folks in Washington know it. They also realize it will take compromise to get things done. As CNN said, “Both sides agree the best outcome would be a broad deal addressing the overall need for deficit reduction, including reforms to the tax system and entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.” Let’s hope our politicians put politics aside and do what’s best for our country to get us growing strongly on the road to economic prosperity.

How the Markets Are Reacting

With the polls showing the President in the lead going into Election Day, the financial markets shouldn’t have been surprised when he won – but it appears they were. U.S. stocks dropped 3.6 percent in the two days after the election before finishing slightly higher on Friday, according to data from Yahoo! Finance.

Looking at history, it’s interesting to note that the stock market performed quite well during President Obama’s first term. The S&P 500 index rose 76 percent from inauguration day to last week’s Election Day. By contrast, it declined 13 percent during George W. Bush’s first term, rose 60 percent during Bill Clinton’s first term, and rose 25 percent during Ronald Reagan’s first term, according to MarketWatch. How much of those returns can be attributed to each President’s policies is anybody’s guess, so it’s hard to draw solid conclusions from them.

In terms of sectors to monitor, MarketWatch says the following might benefit from the election results:

·         Healthcare. Drug companies and insurers might benefit from the healthcare mandate as coverage expands over time.

·         Home construction and real estate. Continued quantitative easing and low interest rates may bode well for the housing market. This could be very beneficial for the economy as housing plays a significant role in economic growth.

·         Precious metals. Gold prices rose last week as investors think continued quantitative easing could be bullish for the shiny metal.

Where We Go From Here

Putting the election behind us has removed one hurdle to moving the country forward. With campaigning out of the way, Washington can get back to work.

As Congress and the President engage in posturing and gamesmanship over the fiscal cliff and the tax and entitlement reform issues, be prepared for volatile stock prices over the next couple months. Ironically, politicians may not take decisive action on these issues until forced to through the pressure of lower stock prices.

Aside from the pressing issues, is there a reason for optimism on the economy? Yes. According to Bloomberg, “The median prediction of 37 economists surveyed by Blue Chip Economic Indicators is that during the next four years, economic growth will gather momentum as jobless people return to work and unused machinery is put back into service.” Bloomberg also pointed out the following positive indicators:

·         Banks have strengthened their balance sheets.

·         Most households, which borrowed too much during the housing bubble, have pared their debt back to normal levels through a combination of frugality and default.

·         Upper-income households’ balance sheets are in good shape, although mortgage debt remains a heavy burden at lower-income levels, says Mark Zandi, chief economist of forecaster Moody’s Analytics as quoted by Bloomberg.

·         Housing prices have gone from falling to rising, buoying confidence.

·         Increased consumer spending should induce more business investment in a virtuous circle.

·         There’s pent-up demand for residential and commercial construction.

Stepping outside the U.S., we still have major economic and budget issues in Europe, China is going through a once in a decade leadership change while its economy slows down, and the Middle East, as always, is a wildcard.

As you can see, we have a lot on our plate to monitor! And, as your advisor, we’re doing our best to keep you well positioned to benefit no matter what Washington throws at us.


Weekly Focus – A Salute to Our Veterans

As we honor our Veterans, we’d like to share an excerpt from the President’s Veterans Day Proclamation:

“Whether they fought in Salerno or Samarra, Heartbreak Ridge or Helmand, Khe Sanh or the Korengal, our veterans are part of an unbroken chain of men and women who have served our country with honor and distinction. On Veterans Day, we show them our deepest thanks. Their sacrifices have helped secure more than two centuries of American progress, and their legacy affirms that no matter what confronts us or what trials we face, there is no challenge we cannot overcome, and our best days are still ahead.”

Thank you to all who are serving, who have served, and to the families and friends supporting our Veterans. We truly appreciate all you do for our country.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

2013 Federal Income Tax Update

Overview
This may be the final year the Bush tax cuts remain in effect unless Congress acts to further extend them. The Bush tax cuts, enacted in 2001 and 2003, were originally scheduled to expire for tax years beginning in 2011. However, President Obama signed legislation in late 2010 that temporarily extended the Bush tax cuts through 2012.

Uncertainty remains as to whether Congress will take action to extend these tax cuts. If Congress fails to extend the Bush tax cuts, many significant rate changes and other substantive changes will take effect in 2013. This article summarizes the major federal income tax changes that are scheduled take effect in 2013 if Congress allows the Bush tax cuts to expire, certain other changes scheduled to take effect independent of the Bush tax cuts, and planning strategies to reduce the impact of these changes.

 

Listed below are areas we believe to be of most interest to many of our clients:

#1.  Individual Income Tax Rates
If Congress allows the Bush tax cuts to expire, ordinary income tax rates will increase for most individual taxpayers beginning in 2013. As discussed below, qualified dividend income that is currently taxed at long-term capital gain rates will be taxed at the higher ordinary income rates. The following table sets forth the scheduled rate increases, using 2012 dollar amounts which will be adjusted for inflation in 2013.


Tax Brackets (2012 Dollar Amounts)
Marginal Rate
Unmarried Filers ($)
Married Joint Filers ($)
Over
But Not Over
Over
But Not Over
2012
2013
0
8,700
0
17,400
10%
15%
8,700
35,350
17,400
70,700*
15%
15%
35,350
85,650
70,700*
142,700
25%
28%
85,650
178,650
142,700
217,450
28%
31%
178,650
388,350
217,450
388,350
33%
36%
388,350
---
388,350
---
35%
39.6%

* In 2013, this dollar amount will decrease to 167% of the amount for unmarried taxpayers in the same bracket (which is $58,900 in 2012), rather than 200% of the amount for unmarried taxpayers under current law. This change will have the effect of putting more middle-income joint filers in the 28% bracket and increasing the "marriage penalty" for many taxpayers.

#2.  Long-Term Capital Gain Rates
The maximum rate on long-term capital gain is scheduled to increase from 15 to 20 percent in 2013. Individual taxpayers in the 10 and 15 percent ordinary income tax brackets currently pay no tax on long-term capital gain. These taxpayers are scheduled to be subject to a 10 percent long-term capital gain rate in 2013. An 18 percent maximum Long-Term Capital Gain rate will apply to capital assets purchased after 2000 and held for more than five years. Additionally, the 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax discussed below will increase the effective rate of tax on long-term capital gain for certain higher-income taxpayers to as high as 23.8 percent. The following table sets forth the scheduled rate increases.
 

Maximum Rates
2012
2013
2013 (including Medicare contribution tax)
Long-Term Capital Gain
15%
20%
23.8%
Qualified 5-Year Capital Gain
15%
18%
21.8%

 

Planning Strategies:  If Congress fails to take action as the year-end approaches, investors who were otherwise considering selling appreciated stocks or securities in early 2013 should give additional consideration to selling in 2012 to take advantage of the lower rate, assuming they will have held the asset for longer than one year. Additionally, business owners who are considering selling their business in the near future should consult with their tax adviser to discuss whether electing out of the installment method for an installment sale in 2012 would be more advantageous from a tax planning perspective. Electing out of Installment sale will tax 100% of the gain in year 2012 with all taxes payable by April 15, 2013 which may occur prior to 100% of the cash proceeds being collected. 

#3.  Dividend Income Rates
The Bush tax cuts created the concept of "qualified dividend income" which currently allows dividends received from domestic corporations and certain foreign corporations to be taxed at the taxpayer's long-term capital gain rate. Additionally, qualified dividend income earned by mutual funds and exchange-traded funds may be distributed to shareholders and treated as qualified dividend income by the shareholder. Prior to the Bush tax cuts, all dividend income was taxed as ordinary income. If Congress fails to extend these provisions, the qualified dividend income provisions will expire, and all dividends will once again be taxed as ordinary income. Most notably, taxpayers in the highest marginal income tax bracket who currently enjoy the 15 percent rate on qualified dividend income will be taxed at 39.6 percent for dividends received from the same issuer in 2013. Additionally, the 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax discussed below will increase the effective rate of tax on dividend income for certain higher-income taxpayers to as high as 43.4 percent. The following table sets forth the scheduled rate increases.

 

Maximum Rates
2012
2013
2013 (including Medicare contribution tax)
Qualified Dividend Income
15%
39.6%
43.4%
Ordinary Dividend Income
35%
39.6%
43.4%

 

Planning Strategies:  Because of the impending increase to tax rates applicable to dividends, owners of closely held  (C type) corporations should consider declaring and paying a larger-than-normal dividend this year if the corporation has sufficient earnings and profits. Owners should carefully plan any such distributions as distributions in excess of the corporation's earnings and profits will reduce the shareholder's stock basis and subject the shareholder to increased long-term capital gain taxable at potentially higher rates when the shareholder subsequently disposes of the stock. Owners of closely held corporations should consult their tax adviser to discuss dividend planning and other strategies such as leveraged recapitalizations to take advantage of the low rate currently applicable to qualified dividend income; S-corporations that make cash distributions in excess of shareholders basis are treated as long-term capital gains.  The gain is reported on the shareholders individual Schedule D.

#4.  New Medicare Contribution Tax
A new 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on certain unearned income of individuals, trusts, and estates is scheduled to take effect in 2013. This provision, which was enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) or sometimes referred to as OBAMACARE,  is scheduled to take effect regardless of whether Congress extends the Bush tax cuts. For individuals, the 3.8 percent tax will be imposed on the lesser of the individual's net investment income or the amount by which the individual's modified adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeds certain thresholds ($250,000 for married individuals filing jointly or $200,000 for unmarried individuals). For purposes of this tax, investment income includes interest, dividends, income from trades or businesses that are passive activities or that trade in financial instruments and commodities, and net gains from the disposition of property held in a trade or business that is a passive activity or that trades in financial instruments and commodities. Investment income excludes distributions from qualified retirement plans and excludes any items that are taken into account for self-employment tax purposes.

Planning Strategies:  Until the Department of Treasury issues clarifying regulations, uncertainty remains regarding which types of investment income will be subject to this new tax. Taxpayers whose modified AGI exceeds the thresholds described above should consult their tax adviser to plan for the imposition of this tax. Specifically, business owners should discuss with their tax adviser whether it would be more advantageous to become "active" in their business rather than "passive" for purposes of this tax. Owners of certain business entities such as partnerships and LLCs should also consider whether a potential change to "active" status in the business could trigger self-employment tax liability. Investors in pass-through entities such as partnerships, LLCs, and S corporations should also review the tax distribution language in the relevant entity agreement to ensure that future tax distributions will account for this new tax.


Additionally, individuals will have a greater incentive to maximize their retirement plan contributions since distributions from qualified retirement plans are not included in investment income for purposes of the tax. While distributions from traditional IRAs and 401(k) plans are not included in investment income for purposes of the tax, they do increase an individual's modified AGI and may push the individual above the modified AGI threshold, thus subjecting the individual's other investment income to the tax. Individuals may also consider converting their traditional retirement plan into a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) this year since Roth distributions are not included in investment income and do not increase the individual's modified AGI. Although the Roth conversion would be taxable at ordinary rates, individuals should consider converting this year, in 2012, to avoid the higher ordinary rates scheduled to take effect in 2013.

 

#5.  Reduction in Itemized Deductions
Under current law, itemized deductions are not subject to any overall limitation. If the Bush tax cuts expire, an overall limitation on itemized deductions for higher-income taxpayers will once again apply. Most itemized deductions, except deductions for medical and dental expenses, investment interest, and casualty and theft losses, will be reduced by the lesser of 3 percent of AGI above an inflation-adjusted threshold or 80 percent of the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowable. The inflation-adjusted threshold is projected to be approximately $174,450 in 2013 for all taxpayers except those married filing separately. Doing a tax projection for year 2012 before December 31, 2012 is the best way to determine if accelerating the payment of year 2013 into year 2012 provides significant tax savings.

Planning Strategies:  Because the overall limitation on itemized deductions will automatically apply to higher-income taxpayers, planning strategies are limited and highly individualized. Accelerating certain itemized deductions in 2012 to avoid the limitation may trigger alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability in 2012. Taxpayers should consult with their tax adviser to discuss the impact of this limitation and whether it may be advantageous to accelerate certain deductions, if possible, to 2012.


#6.  Reduction in Election to Expense Certain Depreciable Business Assets
Taxpayers may currently elect to expense certain depreciable business assets (Section 179 assets) in the year the assets are placed into service rather than capitalize and depreciate the cost over time. Section 179 assets include machinery, equipment, other tangible personal property, and computer software. Computer software falls out of this definition in 2013. The maximum allowable expense cannot exceed a specified amount, which is reduced dollar-for-dollar by the amount of Section 179 assets placed into service exceeding an investment ceiling. Both the maximum allowable expense and the investment ceiling will decrease next year, as shown in the table below.

 

 
2012 ($)
2013 ($)
Maximum Allowable Expense
139,000
25,000
Investment Ceiling
560,000
200,000

 

Planning Strategies:  The change in law will both significantly decrease the dollar amount of Section 179 assets that may be expensed and cause the phase-out to be triggered at a lower threshold. Accordingly, business owners should consider placing Section 179 assets into service in 2012 to take advantage of the immediate tax benefit. Additionally, purchases of qualifying computer software should be accelerated to 2012, if possible, as such purchases will no longer qualify for expensing in 2013.

 

#7.  Other Changes Affecting Individuals

·         Additional employee portion of payroll tax. The employee portion of the hospital insurance payroll tax will increase by 0.9 percent (from 1.45 percent to 2.35 percent) on wages over $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly and $200,000 for other taxpayers. The employer portion of this tax remains 1.45 percent for all wages. This provision, which was enacted as part of the PPACA, is scheduled to take effect in 2013 regardless of whether Congress extends the Bush tax cuts.

·         Phase-out of personal exemptions. A higher-income taxpayer's personal exemptions (currently $3,800 per exemption) will be phased out when AGI exceeds an inflation-indexed threshold. The inflation-adjusted threshold is projected to be $261,650 for married taxpayers filing jointly and $174,450 for unmarried taxpayers.

·         Medical and Dental Expense Deduction. As part of the PPACA, the threshold for claiming the itemized medical and dental expense deduction is scheduled to increase from 7.5 to 10 percent of AGI. The 7.5 percent threshold will continue to apply through 2016 for taxpayers (or spouses) who are 65 and older.

·         Decrease in standard deduction for married taxpayers filing jointly. The standard deduction for married taxpayers filing jointly will decrease to 167% (rather than the current 200%) of the standard deduction for unmarried taxpayers (currently $5,950). In 2012 dollars, this would lower the standard deduction for joint filers from $11,900 to $9,900.

·         Above-the-line student loan interest deduction. This deduction will apply only to interest paid during the first 60 months in which interest payments are required, whereas no such time limitation applies under current law. The deduction will phase out over lower modified AGI amounts, which are projected to be $75,000 for joint returns and $50,000 for all other returns.

·         Income exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance. This exclusion, which allows employees to exclude from income up to $5,250 of employer-provided educational assistance, is scheduled to expire.

·         Home sale exclusion. Heirs, estates, and qualified revocable trusts (trusts that were treated as owned by the decedent immediately prior to death) will no longer be able to take advantage of the $250,000 exclusion of gain from the sale of the decedent's principal residence.

·         Credit for household and dependent care expenses. Maximum creditable expenses will decrease from $3,000 to $2,400 (for one qualifying individual) and from $6,000 to $4,800 (for two or more individuals). The maximum credit will decrease from 35 percent to 30 percent of creditable expenses. The AGI-based reduction in the credit will begin at $10,000 rather than $15,000.

·         Child credit. The maximum credit will decrease from $1,000 to $500 per child and cannot be used to offset AMT liability.

·         Earned Income Tax Credit. The phase-out ranges for claiming the credit, which vary depending on the number of qualifying children, are scheduled to decrease for joint returns. Further, the credit will be reduced by the taxpayer's AMT liability.

 

Please call us if you would like to discuss any of the potential changes and/or planning strategies.

 

 

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.

*     This notice is required by IRS Circular 230, which regulates written communications about federal tax matters between tax advisors and their clients. To the extent the preceding correspondence and/or any attachment is a written tax advice communication, it is not a full "covered opinion." Accordingly, this advice is not intended and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS.

*     This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential client information. The information is intended only for the use of the individual to whom or entity to which it is addressed.  If you are not the addressee or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this e-mail to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, distribution, disclosure, copying, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

*     This is provided for informational purposes. Please seek the opinion of your tax advisor regarding your personal tax advice/services situation.