“Gonna take a sentimental journey…Gonna set my heart at ease…Gonna make a sentimental journey…To renew old memories.” If you’re a fan of Ella Fitzgerald or Frank Sinatra, then you probably recognize these lyrics. Although we rarely think of them as such, the ups and downs of stock and bond markets are sentimental journeys. They reflect the thoughts and attitudes of investors toward particular companies, investments, and markets. Investopedia explains it like this:
“Market sentiment
is the feeling or tone of a market, or its crowd psychology, as revealed
through the activity and price movement of the securities traded in that
market. For example, rising prices would indicate a bullish market sentiment,
while falling prices would indicate a bearish market sentiment. Market
sentiment is also called "investor sentiment" and is not always based
on fundamentals.”
The American
Association of Individual Investors (AAII) measures investor sentiment by
polling their membership each week. The long-term average is 39 percent
bullish, 30.5 percent neutral, and 30.5 percent bearish. Last week, 28.3
percent of its members were bullish, 28.7 percent were bearish, and 43 percent
were neutral.
According to Yahoo! Finance, that’s the highest level of investor neutrality in
more than a decade and may indicate a sharp move up or down is coming soon. “Going
back to 2005, AAII neutral sentiment has pushed to 38 on four distinct prior
occasions… Looking at the S&P 500 a month later showed greater than 4
percent moves each time over the subsequent 30 days.”
The article, which was published last
week, failed to mention the AAII neutral sentiment measure has surpassed 38 on
eight occasions since the start of 2014. A quick inspection of S&P 500 pricing
indicates markets have moved by 1 to 6 percent during the subsequent month (although
we are not yet 30 days from some of those dates). Regardless of the number of
times investor neutrality has pushed to 38 or above, or the sharpness of the
subsequent market moves, not all of those moves have been in the same direction so it’s hard to predict what this bout of neutral sentiment
may indicate.
double, double, toil, and trouble… During the twentieth century, the world’s population doubled not once,
but twice. While it is not expected to double again in this century, according
to The Economist, the number of older
people is expected to double. By 2035, 13 percent of the world’s population – about
1.1 billion people – will be age 65 or older. Assuming no major diseases,
disasters, or world wars, demographers at the United Nations predict the global
population will reach nine billion by 2045. That’s a lot of people!
Demographic changes are likely to have a powerful
effect on global economies. In the United States, the leading edge of the Baby
Boom generation is entering retirement. According to National Geographic:
“The end of a
baby boom can have two big economic effects on a country. The first is the
“demographic dividend” – a blissful few decades when the boomers swell the
labor force and the number of young and old dependents is relatively small and
there is thus a lot of money for other things. Then the second effect kicks in:
The boomers start to retire. What had been considered the enduring demographic
order is revealed to be a party that has to end. The sharpening American debate
over Social Security and last year’s strikes in France over increasing the
retirement age are responses to a problem that exists throughout the developed
world: how to support an aging population.”
The old-age dependency ratio, which compares the number
of older people (above age 64) in a country to the working population (people
aged 15 to 64), was 20:100 in the United States during 2012. By 2035, the
United Nations predicts the ratio will be 44:100. How will our aging population
affect economic growth? Some economists believe economic growth will slow in
countries with high ratios; others say that older, well-educated people will
work longer and retire later so aging will have little effect. A third group anticipates
persistent economic stagnation. So, what can we expect? It all depends on
“changes in the size of the workforce; changes in the rate of productivity
growth; and changes in the pattern of savings.” Stay tuned!
“It seems
essential, in relationships and all tasks, that we concentrate only on what is
most significant and important.”
--Soren Aabye Kierkegaard, Danish philosopher and
theologian
No comments:
Post a Comment